Some People Count Sheep…

Insomnia and math…Call it “amateur numerology”.

About these ads

6 Responses to “Some People Count Sheep…”

  1. nursemyra Says:

    I feel dizzy…..

  2. The Necromancer Says:

    It is a little mesmerizing, isn’t it?

  3. FM Says:

    Intrigued, I decided to try to establish the general case and then prove it using mathematical induction. As it turns out, the general case is so incredibly trivial that constructing a proof would be absurd. (Indeed, it resolves to an algebraic tautology).

    BUT – this exercise didn’t satisfy me because it didn’t capture the idea of “adding the numbers represented by the individual numerals composing a number”. It occurred to me that in order to do this, one would have to construct a model (c.f. Gödel) of Peano arithmetic that gives you a metalanguage to mobilize the distinction between “numeral” (or digit) and “number”. Too long and too hard for me (I’m not very good at logic nor math).

    If you did make such a model, then I suspect you could also generalize THAT case to all possible base-10 positional notation systems (other than the Hindu-Arabic numeral system).

  4. The Necromancer Says:

    Finn: As a historian of science I’m sadly pretty lackluster in the math department…But I do find it interesting that the “model” to “capture the idea of ‘adding the numbers represented by individual numeral composing a number’” would be a little complex. It’s an axiom of numerology to employ that process (until you pare down to a “pure” single digit). Demystifying it would be fascinating…And terribly bothersome to devoted numerologists…

  5. FM Says:

    I suppose building a nuclear reactor and then irradiating mercury to synthesize gold would be terribly tiring to alchemists as well.

    I suppose double-blind clinical trials would be terribly tiring to homeopaths as well.

    I suppose explaining planetary motion using special relativity would be tiresome to astrologists as well.

    See a pattern? (hehehe, pun intended).

    If we want to demystify, then reasoned argument from logical axioms or well-measured empirical data is what we need. Everything else is just poetry.

  6. The Necromancer Says:

    This doesn’t necessarily demystify, but it certainly clarifies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 920 other followers

%d bloggers like this: